Merger between Bayer and Monsanto

Consumers, farmers, and the environment are all at risk from further damage by the recent merger between Bayer and Monsanto. For obvious reasons (poor PR), the name ‘Monsanto’ will be dropped.

While depressing news, this article by John Vidal in the Guardian also gives hope of the strength and love within the community. “Debal Deb, an Indian plant researcher who grows forgotten crops and is the antithesis of Bayer and Monsanto… Deb’s community seed bank is one of the last living repositories of hundreds of Indian rice varieties.”

“Nearly 10 million of the poorest farmers now use the system of rice intensification (SRI), which has been proven to increase rice, wheat, potato and other yields dramatically by stimulating the roots of crops. Agro-forestry techniques that grow trees and shrubs among crops is proving more productive, as is land restoration. Farmers’ groups in India and across Latin America are developing their own seed companies in order to avoid the new corporate monopolies.”

The System of Rice Intensification has been developed at Cornell University USA. Their goals are to:

  • Make knowledge easily accessible to any interested farmer in Asia, Africa, and Latin America and beyond
  • Advance the application of ecological agriculture by further developing SRI and integrating it with other agro-ecological approaches
  • Improve the science-based understanding of how and why crops planted with SRI principles achieve improved performance and productivity

Our natural world is disappearing before our eyes.

This article by George Monbiot sadly outlines that “The creatures we feared our grandchildren wouldn’t see have vanished: it’s happened faster than even pessimists predicted.”

Amongst the list of disasters, he says “The merger between Bayer and Monsanto brings together the manufacturer of the world’s most lethal pesticides with the manufacturer of the world’s most lethal herbicides. Already the concentrated power of these behemoths is a hazard to democracy; together they threaten both political and ecological disaster.”

The full article in The Guardian can be read here.

Whanganui River in N.Zealand gains legal rights

“Winding its way through dense forest laced with hidden waterfalls, the Whanganui River is the largest navigable river in Aotearoa, the Māori word for New Zealand. With the passage of the Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Bill in March, the river became the first water system in the world to be recognized as a rights-bearing entity, holding legal “personhood” status. One implication of the agreement is that the Whanganui River is no longer property of New Zealand’s Crown government — the river now owns itself.

“Five days after the Te Awa Tupua Bill, the High Court of Uttarakhand at Naintal, in northern India, issued a ruling declaring that both the Ganga and Yumana rivers are also “legal persons/living persons.” But what does it mean for a river, or an ecosystem to hold rights? The answer may vary from place to place.

“The growing global movement for Rights of Nature — or the Rights of Mother Earth as some cultures prefer — seeks to define legal rights for ecosystems to exist, flourish, and regenerate their natural capacities. These laws challenge the status of nature as mere property to be owned and dominated by humans, and provide a legal framework for an ethical and spiritual relationship to the Earth. While recognizing legal rights of nature doesn’t stop development wholesale, it can stop the kind of development that interferes with the existence and vitality of ecosystems. In the last decade, four countries and dozens of US communities have passed laws recognizing “legal standing” for ecosystems.

“In many cases, legal recognition for the rights of ecosystems reinforces long-held cultural and spiritual beliefs. For the Māori of Aotearoa, like many Indigenous cultures worldwide, there is no separation between humans and everything else.”

Read the whole article here.

Whanganui River
Photo: Felix Engelhardt